From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <notifications@github.com>
To: tohojo/flent <flent@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>,
flent-users <flent-users@flent.org>
Subject: Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] RRUL Upload plot - why such low granularity? (#185)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 12:08:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tohojo/flent/issues/185/536331577@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tohojo/flent/issues/185@github.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]
flent-users <notifications@github.com> writes:\r
\r
> Hi Toke,\r
>\r
>> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notifications@github.com> wrote:\r
>> \r
>> Rich Brown <notifications@github.com> writes:\r
>> \r
>> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much\r
>> > better plots (see below).\r
>> \r
>> Great!\r
>> \r
>> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz\r
>> > Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.\r
>> \r
>> No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will hit you at high\r
>> rates (I was testing on a gigabit link).\r
>> \r
>> I'm not sure we can realistically pick an option that works well for\r
>> both slow and fast links. So we may have to add a switch; and then the\r
>> problem becomes what to use for defaults...\r
>\r
> How about make it not a "switch" but a numeric parameter, and\r
> default to the current default value by principle of least\r
> surprise?\r
\r
Well, by "switch" I just meant "new command line option". The obvious\r
form of that would be, as you say, just the ability to set the netperf\r
xfer size directly...\r
\r
\r
-- \r
You are receiving this because you commented.\r
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\r
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/185#issuecomment-536331577
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3018 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-29 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tohojo/flent/issues/185@github.com>
2019-09-19 14:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-19 18:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-29 18:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-29 19:05 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-09-29 19:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-09-29 19:34 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.flent.org/postorius/lists/flent-users.flent.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tohojo/flent/issues/185/536331577@github.com \
--to=notifications@github.com \
--cc=comment@noreply.github.com \
--cc=flent-users@flent.org \
--cc=flent@noreply.github.com \
--cc=reply+AHVNJP5TBZ2RLAX6JBA647F3TYZ2NEVBNHHB3DQ34A@reply.github.com \
--subject='Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] RRUL Upload plot - why such low granularity? (#185)' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox