flent-users writes: > Hi Toke, > >> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> Rich Brown writes: >> >> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much >> > better plots (see below). >> >> Great! >> >> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz >> > Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks. >> >> No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will hit you at high >> rates (I was testing on a gigabit link). >> >> I'm not sure we can realistically pick an option that works well for >> both slow and fast links. So we may have to add a switch; and then the >> problem becomes what to use for defaults... > > How about make it not a "switch" but a numeric parameter, and > default to the current default value by principle of least > surprise? Well, by "switch" I just meant "new command line option". The obvious form of that would be, as you say, just the ability to set the netperf xfer size directly... -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/185#issuecomment-536331577