Flent-users discussion archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: tohojo/flent
	<reply+AHVNJP77Q7A7JPJM652V4KF3TYXA3EVBNHHB3DQ34A@reply.github.com>
Cc: tohojo/flent <flent@noreply.github.com>,
	Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>,
	flent-users <flent-users@flent.org>
Subject: Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] RRUL Upload plot - why such low granularity? (#185)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:05:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D0F6341E-7699-4395-9101-B1F2585DAA34@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tohojo/flent/issues/185/536329614@github.com>

Hi Toke,

> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> Rich Brown <notifications@github.com> writes:
> 
> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
> > better plots (see below).
> 
> Great!
> 
> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz
> > Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
> 
> No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will hit you at high
> rates (I was testing on a gigabit link).
> 
> I'm not sure we can realistically pick an option that works well for
> both slow and fast links. So we may have to add a switch; and then the
> problem becomes what to use for defaults...

	How about make it not a "switch" but a numeric parameter, and default to the current default value by principle of least surprise?

Best Regards
	Sebastian

> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Flent-users mailing list
> Flent-users@flent.org
> http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org


_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-29 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tohojo/flent/issues/185@github.com>
2019-09-19 14:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-19 18:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-29 18:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-29 19:05   ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2019-09-29 19:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-29 19:34   ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.flent.org/postorius/lists/flent-users.flent.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D0F6341E-7699-4395-9101-B1F2585DAA34@gmx.de \
    --to=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=comment@noreply.github.com \
    --cc=flent-users@flent.org \
    --cc=flent@noreply.github.com \
    --cc=reply+AHVNJP77Q7A7JPJM652V4KF3TYXA3EVBNHHB3DQ34A@reply.github.com \
    --subject='Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] RRUL Upload plot - why such low granularity? (#185)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox