Flent-users discussion archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
@ 2021-09-27 12:36 j-breyer
  2021-09-27 21:02 ` [Flent-users] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: j-breyer @ 2021-09-27 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1277 bytes --]

Testing flent with IPv6 Addresses yields a similar error to [Issue #214](https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214), despite installing the irtt tool. (IPv4 works fine with irtt, already tested.)

Running in `-v` to verbose showed me, that the format of IPv6 addresses is false for `irtt`:
Part of the output:
`which: Found irtt executable at /usr/bin/irtt`
`UDP RTT test: Cannot use irtt runner (Irtt connection check failed: Error: address fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0:0: too many colons in address`
`). Using netperf UDP_RR`
`Ping (ms) UDP EF: Adding child NetperfDemoRunner`

flent is run with `--local-bind` and `-H` in my case, for address handover of client and server.

Scrolling a bit through the [irtt docs](https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/heistp/irtt/blob/master/doc/irtt-client.html#host-formats), I found that the host format for IPv6 addresses should be in brackets [ ]

Handing over the `--local-bind` in bracket format as a quick test solves the irtt issue with that address, but of course results in the address resolution to fail

Any help or quick fix is much appreciated!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2747 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
@ 2021-09-27 21:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-27 21:34 ` j-breyer
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-09-27 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 383 bytes --]

Could you please include the full command you're running flent with, and the full log output? I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to do and what goes wrong from your description...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-928275998

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1640 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
  2021-09-27 21:02 ` [Flent-users] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2021-09-27 21:34 ` j-breyer
  2021-09-29  9:19 ` Pete Heist
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: j-breyer @ 2021-09-27 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14531 bytes --]

I'm running the flent tests in a mininet with IPv6 enabled (ping is working).
On server side:
`sudo netserver -6 -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02%h2-eth0 -p 12865 -d`
to start the netserver, then
`sudo irtt server`
for the irtt server

On client side:
`sudo flent rrul -6 -p all_scaled --local-bind=fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -l 60 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -t ipv6 -o ipv6_dscp.pdf -v`
fails to achieve the UDP RTT measurement, but completes the TCP and ICMP6 part (full verbose output below).

Running the same command with IPv4 addresses of the hosts (netserver enabled respectively):
`sudo flent rrul -p all_scaled --local-bind=10.0.6.1 -l 60 -H 10.0.14.2 -t ipv4 -o ipv4_dscp.pdf -v`
works just fine.

The difference in output comes in these lines:
```
Ping (ms) UDP EF: Adding child IrttRunner
which: /usr/local/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: Found irtt executable at /usr/bin/irtt
UDP RTT test: Cannot use irtt runner (Irtt connection check failed: Error: address fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0:0: too many colons in address
). Using netperf UDP_RR
```
which comes from `flent` passing the IPv6 address not in the correct format to `irtt` - `irtt` requires the IPv6 passed in `[a::b]` brackets, to distinguish it from the port (if I read it correctly, [reference to the irtt page](https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/heistp/irtt/blob/master/doc/irtt-client.html#host-formats)


Full output of the IPv6-command:

```
Executing test environment file /usr/share/flent/flent/tests/rrul.conf
Started Flent 1.3.2 using Python 3.8.10.
Looking up hostname 'fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02'.
Executing test environment file /usr/share/flent/flent/tests/rrul.conf
Gathering local metadata
Looking up hostname 'fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02'.
Starting rrul test. Expected run time: 70 seconds.
which: /usr/local/sbin/netperf is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/netperf is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/netperf is not an executable file
which: Found netperf executable at /usr/bin/netperf
Ping (ms) UDP EF: Adding child IrttRunner
which: /usr/local/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: Found irtt executable at /usr/bin/irtt
UDP RTT test: Cannot use irtt runner (Irtt connection check failed: Error: address fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0:0: too many colons in address
). Using netperf UDP_RR
Ping (ms) UDP EF: Adding child NetperfDemoRunner
Ping (ms) UDP BK: Adding child IrttRunner
which: /usr/local/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: Found irtt executable at /usr/bin/irtt
UDP RTT test: Cannot use irtt runner (Irtt connection check failed: Error: address fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0:0: too many colons in address
). Using netperf UDP_RR
Ping (ms) UDP BK: Adding child NetperfDemoRunner
Ping (ms) UDP BE: Adding child IrttRunner
which: /usr/local/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/irtt is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/irtt is not an executable file
which: Found irtt executable at /usr/bin/irtt
UDP RTT test: Cannot use irtt runner (Irtt connection check failed: Error: address fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0:0: too many colons in address
). Using netperf UDP_RR
Ping (ms) UDP BE: Adding child NetperfDemoRunner
which: /usr/local/sbin/fping6 is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/fping6 is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/fping6 is not an executable file
which: Found fping6 executable at /usr/bin/fping6
which: /usr/local/sbin/ping6 is not an executable file
which: /usr/local/bin/ping6 is not an executable file
which: /usr/sbin/ping6 is not an executable file
which: Found ping6 executable at /usr/bin/ping6
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288938
TCP upload BE: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 0 ('Watchdog [TCP upload BE]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 0 ('TCP upload BE')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288941
TCP upload BK: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 1 ('Watchdog [TCP upload BK]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 1 ('TCP upload BK')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288944
TCP upload CS5: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 2 ('Watchdog [TCP upload CS5]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 2 ('TCP upload CS5')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288947
TCP upload EF: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 3 ('Watchdog [TCP upload EF]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 3 ('TCP upload EF')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288950
TCP download BE: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 6 ('Watchdog [TCP download BE]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 6 ('TCP download BE')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288953
TCP download BK: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 7 ('Watchdog [TCP download BK]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 7 ('TCP download BK')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288956
TCP download CS5: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 8 ('Watchdog [TCP download CS5]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 8 ('TCP download CS5')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288959
TCP download EF: Starting watchdog with timeout 75
Started TimerRunner idx 9 ('Watchdog [TCP download EF]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 9 ('TCP download EF')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288962
Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0: Starting watchdog with timeout 80
Started TimerRunner idx 13 ('Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 13 ('Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288965
Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0: Starting watchdog with timeout 80
Started TimerRunner idx 14 ('Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 14 ('Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0')
Forked /usr/bin/netperf as pid 288968
Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0: Starting watchdog with timeout 80
Started TimerRunner idx 15 ('Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0]')
Started NetperfDemoRunner idx 15 ('Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0')
Forked /usr/bin/fping6 as pid 288971
Ping (ms) ICMP: Starting watchdog with timeout 71
Started TimerRunner idx 16 ('Watchdog [Ping (ms) ICMP]')
Started PingRunner idx 16 ('Ping (ms) ICMP')
WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6 -Y EF,EF -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6 -Y EF,EF -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

NetperfDemoRunner Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0 finished
WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6 -Y CS1,CS1 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6 -Y CS1,CS1 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

NetperfDemoRunner Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0 finished
WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6  -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -6  -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0  --  -L fe80::200:aff:fe00:601%h1-eth0 -H fe80::200:aff:fe00:e02 -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: errno 22

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

NetperfDemoRunner Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0 finished
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) ICMP]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) ICMP] finished
PingRunner Ping (ms) ICMP killed by kill event
PingRunner Ping (ms) ICMP finished
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload BE]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload BE] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload BE killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload BK]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload BK] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload BK killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload CS5]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload CS5] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload CS5 killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload EF]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP upload EF] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload EF killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download BE]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download BE] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download BE killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download BK]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download BK] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download BK killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download CS5]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download CS5] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download CS5 killed by kill event
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download EF]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [TCP download EF] finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download EF killed by kill event
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload BE finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload BK finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload CS5 finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP upload EF finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download BE finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download BK finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download CS5 finished
NetperfDemoRunner TCP download EF finished
Runner aggregation finished
Data file written to ./rrul-2021-09-27T210930.953628.ipv6.flent.gz.
Creating new PlotFormatter
CACHEDIR=/home/justus/.cache/matplotlib
Loaded backend pdf version unknown.
Initialised matplotlib v3.4.2 on numpy v1.21.1.
No raw data found for series TCP download avg, falling back to computed values
No raw data found for series TCP upload avg, falling back to computed values
No raw data found for series Ping (ms) UDP EF, falling back to computed values
No raw data found for series Ping (ms) UDP BK, falling back to computed values
No raw data found for series Ping (ms) UDP BE, falling back to computed values
No raw data found for series Ping (ms) avg, falling back to computed values
Saving plot to ipv6_dscp.pdf
Assigning font /b'F1' = '/home/j/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/fonts/ttf/DejaVuSans.ttf'
Embedding font /home/j/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/fonts/ttf/DejaVuSans.ttf.
Writing TrueType font.
Assigning font /b'F1' = '/home/j/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/fonts/ttf/DejaVuSans.ttf'
Embedding font /home/j/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/fonts/ttf/DejaVuSans.ttf.
Writing TrueType font.
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP EF :: child 0] finished
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BK :: child 0] finished
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0]: timer expired
TimerRunner Watchdog [Ping (ms) UDP BE :: child 0] finished
```


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-928304894

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 16000 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
  2021-09-27 21:02 ` [Flent-users] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-27 21:34 ` j-breyer
@ 2021-09-29  9:19 ` Pete Heist
  2021-09-29 10:00 ` j-breyer
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pete Heist @ 2021-09-29  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]

Hi, I guess that creates a bit of a hassle on the flent side as it needs to know the address type in order to surround it with brackets. It comes from Go's requirement for brackets around IPv6 address literals in net.Dial(). I added an issue for irtt, but I don't know if/when that will ever get updated in a Debian package as I'm not maintaining that.

Perhaps a workaround would be to detect IPv6 addresses using Python's ipaddress module and surround it with brackets if necessary before passing it to irtt? I could add that to flent at some point if so...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930000006

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2010 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29  9:19 ` Pete Heist
@ 2021-09-29 10:00 ` j-breyer
  2021-09-29 12:39 ` Pete Heist
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: j-breyer @ 2021-09-29 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 912 bytes --]

>Perhaps a workaround would be to detect IPv6 addresses using Python's ipaddress module and surround it with brackets if necessary before passing it to irtt? I could add that to flent at some point if so...

That'd be very helpful for the moment!
I am also having troubles with other tests, e.g., `rrul46compete`, because it seems sometimes a device interface must be appended to the IPv6 for the apps to work, and sometimes it doesn't, as I'm working with link-local address spaces (i.e., `a::b%dev1` instead of `a::b`).
That may be related to the irtt issue, but maybe it's a whole new issue of its own. (If there is no quick fix for that, I could try to use other IPv6 spaces, but that doesn't help with the issue itself)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930030364

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2242 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29 10:00 ` j-breyer
@ 2021-09-29 12:39 ` Pete Heist
  2021-09-29 14:57 ` j-breyer
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pete Heist @ 2021-09-29 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 398 bytes --]

The proposed fix is in pull request #239.

I tested an rrul test briefly and successfully passed in a link local IPv6 address containing a scope (%dev), so that should work at least as far as irtt is concerned.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930136948

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1992 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29 12:39 ` Pete Heist
@ 2021-09-29 14:57 ` j-breyer
  2021-09-29 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: j-breyer @ 2021-09-29 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 981 bytes --]

I found another workaround by setting up non-scoped IPv6 addresses on the hosts (e.g., `a::601` and `a::e02`).
Then I added them to `/etc/hosts` with a related hostname, e.g., `a::601 mn.h1` and `a::e02 mn.h2`

Running now `sudo flent rrul -p all_scaled -6 --local-bind mn.h1 -l 60 -H mn.h2 -o rrul_hosts6.pdf -v` gives Error free output.

However, I noticed a different bug when using this:
If a host contains an IPv4 as well as an IPv6 address in `/etc/hosts`, flent seems to always prefer the IPv4 entry. This results in the process either failing, because it tries an irtt connection from IPv4 to IPv6 address, or the above test runs the irtt connection completely in IPv4, ignoring the `-6` argument, if both devices can be resolved to an IPv4

Maybe this is content for a separate Issue?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930257638

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2352 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29 14:57 ` j-breyer
@ 2021-09-29 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-29 22:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-09-29 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]

j-breyer ***@***.***> writes:

> I found another workaround by setting up non-scoped IPv6 addresses on the hosts (e.g., `a::601` and `a::e02`).
> Then I added them to `/etc/hosts` with a related hostname, e.g., `a::601 mn.h1` and `a::e02 mn.h2`
>
> Running now `sudo flent rrul -p all_scaled -6 --local-bind mn.h1 -l 60 -H mn.h2 -o rrul_hosts6.pdf -v` gives Error free output.
>
> However, I noticed a different bug when using this:
> If a host contains an IPv4 as well as an IPv6 address in `/etc/hosts`, flent seems to always prefer the IPv4 entry. This results in the process either failing, because it tries an irtt connection from IPv4 to IPv6 address, or the above test runs the irtt connection completely in IPv4, ignoring the `-6` argument, if both devices can be resolved to an IPv4
>
> Maybe this is content for a separate Issue?

Yes, please open a separate issue. Flent uses the host name resolution
mechanism, so in the absence of -4/-6, it should prefer whatever the
host does. However, a -6 should override this, so if it doesn't that's a
bug...


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930581977

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2601 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2021-09-29 22:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-30 13:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-30 14:11 ` j-breyer
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-09-29 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 442 bytes --]

Also, note that as a general point, a fe80:: address is not well-defined without the interface (as link-local addresses are always link-scoped with the same subnet for IPv6). So anytime you use such an address, you should be including the %devname bit...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-930583199

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1699 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-29 22:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2021-09-30 13:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2021-09-30 14:11 ` j-breyer
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2021-09-30 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]

Closed #238 via 187dbb56ac308272d19cf4359ef85717fb7693ae.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#event-5387927729

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2064 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238)
  2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-30 13:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2021-09-30 14:11 ` j-breyer
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: j-breyer @ 2021-09-30 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]

>Yes, please open a separate issue. Flent uses the host name resolution
mechanism, so in the absence of -4/-6, it should prefer whatever the
host does. However, a -6 should override this, so if it doesn't that's a
bug...

Bug persists with updated version of flent, reported in Issue #241 

Thank you for the effort!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/238#issuecomment-931359805

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2138 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-30 14:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-27 12:36 [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] irtt fails with IPv6 (wrong format) (#238) j-breyer
2021-09-27 21:02 ` [Flent-users] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-27 21:34 ` j-breyer
2021-09-29  9:19 ` Pete Heist
2021-09-29 10:00 ` j-breyer
2021-09-29 12:39 ` Pete Heist
2021-09-29 14:57 ` j-breyer
2021-09-29 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-29 22:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-30 13:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-30 14:11 ` j-breyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox