[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 760 bytes --]

I want to test my internet connection, and wanted to test against a virtual machine at Scaleway - which uses 1:1 NAT (seen from the host itself is a private 10.x.x.x/23 IPv4 address mapped to a public IPv4 address) which apparently require setting [an undocumented option -R in netperf](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11981480/error-in-running-netperf-udp-stream-over-openvpn/24211455#24211455).

Please have flent support that custom "re-enable routing which we silently disabled for UDP) netperf option - or support passing custom options if you dislike hardcoding something undocumented.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1636 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]

Jonas Smedegaard <notifications@github.com> writes:

> I want to test my internet connection, and wanted to test against a
> virtual machine at Scaleway - which uses 1:1 NAT (seen from the host
> itself is a private 10.x.x.x/23 IPv4 address mapped to a public IPv4
> address) which apparently require setting [an undocumented option -R
> in
> netperf](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11981480/error-in-running-netperf-udp-stream-over-openvpn/24211455#24211455).
>
> Please have flent support that custom "re-enable routing which we
> silently disabled for UDP) netperf option - or support passing custom
> options if you dislike hardcoding something undocumented.

According to the post you linked this is only for UDP_STREAM tests,
which we don't have any of in Flent; so why exactly is this needed?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-738760559

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1992 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6228 bytes --]

Sorry, I was too quick to conclude the exact cause of error messages I saw in the GUI.

When I saw those errors I cancelled the test, expecting no results at all - but trying more patiently to let it run its course I now see that output is generate (so something works) and those error messages are nicely emitted on console too (not only in GUI window), along with more details:
```
$ flent-gui 
Started Flent 1.3.2 using Python 3.9.1rc1.
Initialised matplotlib v3.3.2 on numpy v1.19.4.
GUI loaded. Running on PyQt v5.15.2.
Starting rrul test. Expected run time: 70 seconds.
WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4 -Y EF,EF -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4 -Y EF,EF -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4 -Y CS1,CS1 -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4 -Y CS1,CS1 -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Program exited non-zero.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4  -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument

WARNING: Command produced no valid data.
Runner class: NetperfDemoRunner
Command: /usr/bin/netperf -P 0 -v 0 -D -0.20 -4  -H XXXXX -p 12865 -t UDP_RR -l 70 -F /dev/urandom    -- -e 2  -H XXXXX -k THROUGHPUT,LOCAL_CONG_CONTROL,REMOTE_CONG_CONTROL,TRANSPORT_MSS,LOCAL_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,REMOTE_TRANSPORT_RETRANS,LOCAL_SOCKET_TOS,REMOTE_SOCKET_TOS,DIRECTION,ELAPSED_TIME,PROTOCOL,LOCAL_SEND_SIZE,LOCAL_RECV_SIZE,REMOTE_SEND_SIZE,REMOTE_RECV_SIZE,LOCAL_BYTES_SENT,LOCAL_BYTES_RECVD,REMOTE_BYTES_SENT,REMOTE_BYTES_RECVD  
Return code: 1
Stdout: send_data: data send error: Invalid argument (errno 22)

Stderr: netperf: send_omni: send_data failed: Invalid argument


Summary of rrul test run from 2020-12-04 20:04:49.807272

                             avg       median          # data pts
 Ping (ms) ICMP   :        40.35        41.60 ms              350
 Ping (ms) UDP BE : No data.
 Ping (ms) UDP BK : No data.
 Ping (ms) UDP EF : No data.
 Ping (ms) avg    :        40.35          N/A ms              350
 TCP download BE  :         0.82         0.77 Mbits/s         350
 TCP download BK  :         0.80         0.75 Mbits/s         350
 TCP download CS5 :         0.79         0.75 Mbits/s         350
 TCP download EF  :         0.67         0.63 Mbits/s         350
 TCP download avg :         0.77          N/A Mbits/s         350
 TCP download sum :         3.08          N/A Mbits/s         350
 TCP totals       :        94.35          N/A Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload BE    :        23.03        23.02 Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload BK    :        22.70        22.67 Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload CS5   :        22.87        22.91 Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload EF    :        22.67        23.21 Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload avg   :        22.82          N/A Mbits/s         350
 TCP upload sum   :        91.27          N/A Mbits/s         350
Data file written to /home/jonas/flent/rrul-2020-12-04T210449.807272.flent.gz.
```

Output graph for an RRUL test is missing the 3 UDP ping series, but all other series seem to have gotten through.  Perhaps this is no issue in flent after all, just my cloud provider blocking UDP ping...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-739000950

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7158 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]

Jonas Smedegaard <notifications@github.com> writes:

> Output graph for an RRUL test is missing the 3 UDP ping series, but
> all other series seem to have gotten through.  Perhaps this is no
> issue in flent after all, just my cloud provider blocking UDP ping...

Or it may be that the same UDP issue you linked also affects the UDP_RR
test; I'll dig around in the netperf source code a bit and see what I
can find :)


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-739493144

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1555 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --]

Quoting Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (2020-12-06 13:03:02)\r
> Or it may be that the same UDP issue you linked also affects the UDP_RR\r
> test; I'll dig around in the netperf source code a bit and see what I\r
> can find :)\r
\r
Thanks - much appreciated!\r
\r
-- \r
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.\r
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\r
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-739498972

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1409 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 978 bytes --]

Jonas Smedegaard <notifications@github.com> writes:\r
\r
> Quoting Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (2020-12-06 13:03:02)\r
>> Or it may be that the same UDP issue you linked also affects the UDP_RR\r
>> test; I'll dig around in the netperf source code a bit and see what I\r
>> can find :)\r
>\r
> Thanks - much appreciated!\r
\r
OK, poked around in the netperf sources a bit, and it seems the UDP_RR\r
test is *not* affected by the -R flag, so the issue is most likely with\r
some other source of blocking.\r
\r
You could try setting up irtt on both server and client and see if that\r
fares better - Flent should automatically pick it up if it's installed\r
on the client, and you just need to start it along with netserver on the\r
server-side:\r
\r
https://github.com/heistp/irtt/\r
\r
\r
-- \r
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.\r
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\r
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-740729292

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2021 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 584 bytes --]

Quoting Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (2020-12-08 17:19:18)\r
> You could try setting up irtt on both server and client and see if that\r
> fares better - Flent should automatically pick it up if it's installed\r
> on the client, and you just need to start it along with netserver on the\r
> server-side:\r
> \r
> https://github.com/heistp/irtt/\r
\r
Installing irtt service worked.  Thanks!\r
\r
-- \r
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.\r
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\r
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-740758702

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1564 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 216 bytes --]

Great! Closing this, then :)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#issuecomment-741039524

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1117 bytes --]

[Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] support (re-)enabling netperf routing of UDP packets (#214)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 194 bytes --]

Closed #214.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/214#event-4086781836

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1426 bytes --]