Flent-users discussion archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] comparison with - or use of - uperf (#213)
       [not found] <tohojo/flent/issues/213@github.com>
@ 2020-11-16 22:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-11-16 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tohojo/flent; +Cc: Subscribed

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 515 bytes --]

Jonas Smedegaard <notifications@github.com> writes:

> It seems this tool has quite some overlap with [uperf](http://www.uperf.org/).

Hmm, maybe? I'm not familiar with uperf...

> Would be nice if flent documentation mentioned how it compares to
> uperf.

... but since you seem to be, would you care to propose some text? :)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1468 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

Flent-users mailing list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-11-16 22:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <tohojo/flent/issues/213@github.com>
2020-11-16 22:26 ` [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] comparison with - or use of - uperf (#213) Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox