Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] box plots missing boxes (#198)

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] box plots missing boxes (#198)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 586 bytes --]

Pete Heist <notifications@github.com> writes:

> In flent from head (1.9.9-git-3d663cf) I seem to be missing the boxes
> on box plots, like the attached image. I'm mostly doing tcp_nup and
> tcp_1up. It's the same on Linux and MacOS. I'll send a .flent.gz in
> case that helps.

That image just looks like what happens when the boxes get squeezed
together because there's only a single data point?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/198#issuecomment-586765803

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2009 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] box plots missing boxes (#198)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]

Pete Heist <notifications@github.com> writes:

> So as it turns out, it would still be useful in this case to be able
> to plot the box plots for each flow in a tcp_nup test. Is there a way
> to do that?

Sure, you just define a new plot definition with type=box instead of
type=box_combine :)


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/198#issuecomment-587005416

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1882 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org