From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F406C7BAB37 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:45:29 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b=WWZGlczO Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-9ac0ecf.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.123.22]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9001F5212FF for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:45:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1608313528; bh=xvdU02ij0VgHBKVM6otaaAGKhJbXU3xmryBtOx8azSA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=WWZGlczOcf68agxhnXEo16/BBgd2eMOpSEE/08nsU2TM/ITBXr7+TMQpy8m//vPJo atoWw0J7cwacBA04RK84qRzPZSkLr6O9yEH4A0RhuLSYKatdMc7OZrFkKnqCR7dAns uZ8lYwAiq8iRWzJTptd+TTqKxk/U2BTESDzmFWPo= Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:45:28 -0800 From: olg33 To: tohojo/flent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5fdceab88c972_4819b43482d0"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: olg33 X-GitHub-Recipient: flent-users X-GitHub-Reason: comment X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: flent-users@flent.org Message-ID-Hash: 353A6VWVJ2XRJ5PQNCQW7YW3TTE757I6 X-Message-ID-Hash: 353A6VWVJ2XRJ5PQNCQW7YW3TTE757I6 X-MailFrom: noreply@github.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: flent-users , Comment X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Reply-To: tohojo/flent Subject: [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] rrul tests are not being able to saturate link (#218) List-Id: Flent discussion list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ----==_mimepart_5fdceab88c972_4819b43482d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi tohojo, Yes, I found the problem. The switch where our servers are connected had other servers and one of them had a port configured by mistake the same Vlan of our piont-to-point connection. In principle that may not be a big deal, but once it was corrected I'm was able to push almost a Gig Up/Down: TCP download avg : 133.64 N/A Mbits/s 351 TCP download sum : 935.50 N/A Mbits/s 351 ---------> OK TCP download::0 (11) : 123.63 123.19 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::1 (13) : 121.54 121.51 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::2 (15) : 121.08 122.05 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::3 (17) : 121.59 121.58 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::4 (19) : 77.91 78.98 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::5 (21) : 244.72 244.05 Mbits/s 351 TCP download::6 (25) : 125.03 124.48 Mbits/s 351 TCP totals : 1871.57 N/A Mbits/s 351 TCP upload avg : 133.72 N/A Mbits/s 351 TCP upload sum : 936.07 N/A Mbits/s 351 ---------> OK TCP upload::0 (11) : 135.29 134.01 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::1 (13) : 134.59 134.75 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::2 (15) : 131.10 131.34 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::3 (17) : 131.24 131.24 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::4 (19) : 134.21 134.62 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::5 (21) : 134.76 134.69 Mbits/s 351 TCP upload::6 (25) : 134.88 134.74 Mbits/s 351 Thanks! -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/218#issuecomment-748226448 ----==_mimepart_5fdceab88c972_4819b43482d0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi tohojo,

Yes, I found the problem. The switch where our servers are connected had other servers and one of them had a port configured by mistake the same Vlan of our piont-to-point connection. In principle that may not be a big deal, but once it was corrected I'm was able to push almost a Gig Up/Down:

TCP download avg : 133.64 N/A Mbits/s 351
TCP download sum : 935.50 N/A Mbits/s 351 ---------> OK
TCP download::0 (11) : 123.63 123.19 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::1 (13) : 121.54 121.51 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::2 (15) : 121.08 122.05 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::3 (17) : 121.59 121.58 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::4 (19) : 77.91 78.98 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::5 (21) : 244.72 244.05 Mbits/s 351
TCP download::6 (25) : 125.03 124.48 Mbits/s 351
TCP totals : 1871.57 N/A Mbits/s 351
TCP upload avg : 133.72 N/A Mbits/s 351
TCP upload sum : 936.07 N/A Mbits/s 351 ---------> OK
TCP upload::0 (11) : 135.29 134.01 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::1 (13) : 134.59 134.75 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::2 (15) : 131.10 131.34 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::3 (17) : 131.24 131.24 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::4 (19) : 134.21 134.62 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::5 (21) : 134.76 134.69 Mbits/s 351
TCP upload::6 (25) : 134.88 134.74 Mbits/s 351

Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5fdceab88c972_4819b43482d0--