From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FD37B4504 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:45:06 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b=fg3lZamo Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-365baff.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.102.46]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C4D9560B84 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:45:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1607445906; bh=+TAOWnjMLVfkLYt5E57uJpFekw0QBsZf8kF5tdL50MM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fg3lZamonUSST+srL9XhOQkOQzQ/yZrUamj6DkwuKyHYHVh11JWNsBUd1tO0nrnPK nrbeKqbGA5oykHAA3JbC72yesPE3eUkh7frq++q5tH6EmOliQSfglCSyTUb3wnup+C bDnUN91QJK2XvyQStJCeqFGUjjQyUSyuNXM0JSus= Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:45:06 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= To: tohojo/flent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5fcfad9217e9a_3e19b412208e"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: tohojo X-GitHub-Recipient: flent-users X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: flent-users@flent.org Message-ID-Hash: ZUI2KFYCRSGL2OLC3OXZCW6EL7RVO6LP X-Message-ID-Hash: ZUI2KFYCRSGL2OLC3OXZCW6EL7RVO6LP X-MailFrom: noreply@github.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Subscribed X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Reply-To: tohojo/flent Subject: [Flent-users] Re: [tohojo/flent] How to create two simultaneous tests with different bandwidth in both hosts? (#217) List-Id: Flent discussion list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ----==_mimepart_5fcfad9217e9a_3e19b412208e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit lealog writes: > The goal is to evaluate and compare different Routers and QOS policies. > Any plans to have Flent supporting this type of use cases? Also, could > be interesting to have Flent managing different hosts and orchestrate > them using a common GUI or CLI. Well, it would require an underlying test tool that could produce this sort of traffic. I wouldn't be opposed to adding support for such a tool if it materialised, but I am not aware of any either. > Unfortunately, I'm not a developer and I'm not able to provide code > for some of these features. Some orchestration is possible already by a combination of tests with multiple remote endpoints, and remote test runners. It requires a bit of fiddling with the CLI and/or batch files to set up, but it's doable. Extending support for running tests through the GUI would be neat, but unless someone dedicates resources to this I don't think it's likely to happen anytime soon, unfortunately... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/217#issuecomment-740752354 ----==_mimepart_5fcfad9217e9a_3e19b412208e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

lealog <notifications@github.com> writes:

> The goal is to evaluate and compare different Routers and QOS policies.
> Any plans to have Flent supporting this type of use cases? Also, could
> be interesting to have Flent managing different hosts and orchestrate
> them using a common GUI or CLI.

Well, it would require an underlying test tool that could produce this
sort of traffic. I wouldn't be opposed to adding support for such a tool
if it materialised, but I am not aware of any either.

> Unfortunately, I'm not a developer and I'm not able to provide code
> for some of these features.

Some orchestration is possible already by a combination of tests with
multiple remote endpoints, and remote test runners. It requires a bit of
fiddling with the CLI and/or batch files to set up, but it's doable.
Extending support for running tests through the GUI would be neat, but
unless someone dedicates resources to this I don't think it's likely to
happen anytime soon, unfortunately...

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5fcfad9217e9a_3e19b412208e--