From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.toke.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 Received: from mail.toke.dk by mail.toke.dk with LMTP id KSMhJqLtfF5EPQIAOr1fkg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:00:02 +0100 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; none (SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=77.235.54.103; helo=web6.sd.eurovps.com; envelope-from=flent-users-bounces@flent.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b=Cyu6FcMq Received: from web6.sd.eurovps.com (web6.sd.eurovps.com [77.235.54.103]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8015871E9A2 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:00:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [::1] (port=59200 helo=web6.sd.eurovps.com) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jHWnO-00B0D4-LJ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:59:58 +0200 Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com ([192.30.252.197]:36759) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jHWnF-00B06i-TD for flent-users@flent.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:59:56 +0200 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:59:09 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585245549; bh=48lW6CJWHklNGxKelqpsKQBHTgXBZPmR79tsRrAU1F8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Cyu6FcMqReeaXrHTey1XN24ZDZjBGSR5hVK0l+YjJGXPjnmNZLPRCuOG/usddfcKs wmV2guqq6oOpUC02qU/q3T1FKD1zh0P8YKhme6M+3EmPvE75Ccs06Av1+lGN9ovuZw KPKG3bZLMNG7UR+xESUQZ+vQJohrQ+iHLuXS2g+M= From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= To: tohojo/flent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: tohojo X-GitHub-Recipient: flent-users X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: flent-users@flent.org Subject: Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Customized test displaying error (#203) X-BeenThere: flent-users@flent.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Flent discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: tohojo/flent Cc: Subscribed Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2149407649589519950==" Errors-To: flent-users-bounces@flent.org Sender: "Flent-users" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web6.sd.eurovps.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - toke.dk X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - flent.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web6.sd.eurovps.com: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: mailman/mailman X-Authenticated-Sender: web6.sd.eurovps.com: mailman@flent.org --===============2149407649589519950== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7ced6d918fe_22af3fcd212cd96c135558"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----==_mimepart_5e7ced6d918fe_22af3fcd212cd96c135558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit olg33 writes: > Hi Tohojo, > > Do yo believe that this proposed rrul_var test will be able to > saturate the link? The main purpose of our testing is to know how much > bandwidth we can pull in a single link, so far the rrul test has made > a good job. Sure, it'll be just like the regular RRUL test, except you can dynamically specify how many flows you want, and how each should be marked. I'll see if I can't get this prototyped soonish :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/203#issuecomment-604584516 ----==_mimepart_5e7ced6d918fe_22af3fcd212cd96c135558 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

olg33 <notifications@github.com> writes:

> Hi Tohojo,
>
> Do yo believe that this proposed rrul_var test will be able to
> saturate the link? The main purpose of our testing is to know how much
> bandwidth we can pull in a single link, so far the rrul test has made
> a good job.

Sure, it'll be just like the regular RRUL test, except you can
dynamically specify how many flows you want, and how each should be
marked. I'll see if I can't get this prototyped soonish :)

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5e7ced6d918fe_22af3fcd212cd96c135558-- --===============2149407649589519950== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Flent-users mailing list Flent-users@flent.org http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org --===============2149407649589519950==--