Rich Brown writes: >> > 2. Why is there a discrepency between the > `--test-parameter=ping_hosts=...` reading (showing 30-38 msec in my > tests) and a separate, concurrent fping test (see original post, where > it was running 20-22 msec)? > >> Good question. IPv4 vs IPv6 maybe? > > I don't think so. Here's fping for both atl.richb-hanover.com (IPv4 only) and atl6 (IPv6)... > > ``` > bash-3.2$ fping -c 1000 atl.richb-hanover.com -D > [1568033075.420184] atl.richb-hanover.com : [0], 84 bytes, 40.4 ms (40.4 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033076.423893] atl.richb-hanover.com : [1], 84 bytes, 40.9 ms (40.6 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033077.426595] atl.richb-hanover.com : [2], 84 bytes, 41.7 ms (41.0 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033078.430768] atl.richb-hanover.com : [3], 84 bytes, 40.8 ms (40.9 avg, 0% loss) > ^C > bash-3.2$ fping -c 1000 atl6.richb-hanover.com -D -6 > [1568033063.252647] atl6.richb-hanover.com : [0], 64 bytes, 40.0 ms (40.0 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033064.254237] atl6.richb-hanover.com : [1], 64 bytes, 40.8 ms (40.4 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033065.257423] atl6.richb-hanover.com : [2], 64 bytes, 40.7 ms (40.5 avg, 0% loss) > [1568033066.261700] atl6.richb-hanover.com : [3], 64 bytes, 40.8 ms (40.6 avg, 0% loss) > ^C > atl6.richb-hanover.com : xmt/rcv/%loss = 4/4/0%, min/avg/max = 40.0/40.6/40.8 > ``` > You're not setting the period; does adding -p 200 make a difference? I suppose fping could be self-congesting if your link is very slow... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/178#issuecomment-529572916