From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.toke.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 Received: from mail.toke.dk by mail.toke.dk with LMTP id N+J3Ag3X4lzrTQAAOr1fkg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 18:34:21 +0200 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; none (SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=77.235.54.103; helo=web6.sd.eurovps.com; envelope-from=flent-users-bounces@flent.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b=pRjc+use Received: from web6.sd.eurovps.com (web6.sd.eurovps.com [77.235.54.103]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB932613DFE for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 18:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [::1] (port=49854 helo=web6.sd.eurovps.com) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hSlEr-003xQl-2J; Mon, 20 May 2019 19:34:13 +0300 Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com ([192.30.252.197]:46813) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hSlEf-003xJ0-FP for flent-users@flent.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 19:34:07 +0300 Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:33:23 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1558370003; bh=XBuMjZmllMdD+GRr1GzH5CCs7ATbeiy1itZqwyIpVBY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pRjc+use1iFhYKVYSom94q9AkkeexLT/8KF5fiN7MyaymS3gh7VU3j0nzdLxw+KMY EcZYih57XvGtIXq19u7m0y23/+bgryzCA6JulFUhmgwuDitAM1lrzMwpiRq5k/4q02 0ApEvY4pikqy74By+sHP1PJEd/8YcSXrMQ2Kt+V8= From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= To: tohojo/flent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: tohojo X-GitHub-Recipient: flent-users X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: flent-users@flent.org Subject: Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Force Iperf test instead netperf? (#161) X-BeenThere: flent-users@flent.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 List-Id: Flent discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: tohojo/flent Cc: Subscribed Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7070357161045148444==" Errors-To: flent-users-bounces@flent.org Sender: "Flent-users" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web6.sd.eurovps.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - toke.dk X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - flent.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web6.sd.eurovps.com: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: mailman/mailman X-Authenticated-Sender: web6.sd.eurovps.com: mailman@flent.org --===============7070357161045148444== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce2d6d375c44_39ce3fdb3f0cd96025982e"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----==_mimepart_5ce2d6d375c44_39ce3fdb3f0cd96025982e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit acdcjavier writes: > Hello > Is it possible to force Iperf testing instead netperf? > > I need to make some thoughtput test in my LAN configuration, but > netperf is older and Iperf is more compatible with Linux/windows. Not generally, no. Netperf has quite a few options that iperf lacks, and it's the tried and true solution on Linux, so that is the primary supported tool. I have thought about restructuring things to allow a fallback, but it's not trivial, so that hasn't materialised yet. You're right that netperf is a bit iffy on Windows, though... one work-around may be to use WSL if you can't use a Linux box... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/161#issuecomment-494060960 ----==_mimepart_5ce2d6d375c44_39ce3fdb3f0cd96025982e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit acdcjavier <notifications@github.com> writes:

> Hello
> Is it possible to force Iperf testing instead netperf?
>
> I need to make some thoughtput test in my LAN configuration, but
> netperf is older and Iperf is more compatible with Linux/windows.

Not generally, no. Netperf has quite a few options that iperf lacks, and
it's the tried and true solution on Linux, so that is the primary
supported tool. I have thought about restructuring things to allow a
fallback, but it's not trivial, so that hasn't materialised yet.

You're right that netperf is a bit iffy on Windows, though... one
work-around may be to use WSL if you can't use a Linux box...

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_5ce2d6d375c44_39ce3fdb3f0cd96025982e-- --===============7070357161045148444== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Flent-users mailing list Flent-users@flent.org http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org --===============7070357161045148444==--