[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Netperf latency stats vs ICMP (#160)

[Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Netperf latency stats vs ICMP (#160)

[cklatsky]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]

Hi,

Do any of the supplied tests utilize netperf generated latency statistics (-j option) for the latency value?

Regards,
Carl

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/160

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1149 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org

Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] Netperf latency stats vs ICMP (#160)

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 526 bytes --]

cklatsky <notifications@github.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Do any of the supplied tests utilize netperf generated latency
> statistics (-j option) for the latency value?

Not currently, no. Not sure how Netperf actually gets those values for
TCP either. With the --socket-stats option you can get the values
reported by the kernel, though...


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/160#issuecomment-491407986

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1474 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org