Pete Heist &lt;notifications@github.com&gt; writes:<br>
<br>
&gt;&gt; On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:40 PM, flent-users &lt;notifications@github.com&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; Hi Pete,<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; On Aug 25, 2018, at 19:53, Pete Heist &lt;notifications@github.com&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; 50ms wouldn&#39;t be too disruptive in most cases. At 1 Mbit, the 5% of bandwidth threshold is crossed.<br>
&gt;&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; Would it be possible to simply also show this bandwidth use in the<br>
&gt;&gt; bandwidth plots (say as a single data series accumulated over all<br>
&gt;&gt; irtt probes), then the user could select the interval and still be<br>
&gt;&gt; able to easily assess the effects on other bandwidth flows? I believe<br>
&gt;&gt; that would also be great for the netperf UDP/ICMP streams, but<br>
&gt;&gt; probably harder to implement<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; We could, but I would think what might happen is that in most cases<br>
&gt; you’ll have a line that appears close to 0 Mbit, relative to other<br>
&gt; flows, and we probably wouldn’t want to change the scaling for the<br>
&gt; scaled bandwidth plots to accommodate that...<br>
<br>
I think the important part of this is that it would be reflected in the<br>
total bandwidth score. I&#39;ve been meaning to implement this for a while<br>
for netperf UDP_RR, because otherwise you can get spurious bandwidth<br>
drops as latency decreases just because the latency measurement flows<br>
take up more bandwidth. But, well, irtt sort of made that less urgent ;)<br>
<br>
But I could revisit; I do believe I already capture the data from irtt<br>
(I think?).<br>
<br>
-Toke<br>


<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you commented.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AerUv1XydwHNRW4Dl1IcKt_7l-oba0FUks5uU-PGgaJpZM4WCoe6">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AerUv-SZEw8sYgBjGSF6sEBBI_5GX7h8ks5uU-PGgaJpZM4WCoe6.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/tohojo/flent","title":"tohojo/flent","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/tohojo/flent"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@tohojo in #148: Pete Heist \u003cnotifications@github.com\u003e writes:\n\n\u003e\u003e On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:40 PM, flent-users \u003cnotifications@github.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Hi Pete,\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e \u003e On Aug 25, 2018, at 19:53, Pete Heist \u003cnotifications@github.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e \n\u003e\u003e \u003e 50ms wouldn't be too disruptive in most cases. At 1 Mbit, the 5% of bandwidth threshold is crossed.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Would it be possible to simply also show this bandwidth use in the\n\u003e\u003e bandwidth plots (say as a single data series accumulated over all\n\u003e\u003e irtt probes), then the user could select the interval and still be\n\u003e\u003e able to easily assess the effects on other bandwidth flows? I believe\n\u003e\u003e that would also be great for the netperf UDP/ICMP streams, but\n\u003e\u003e probably harder to implement\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e We could, but I would think what might happen is that in most cases\n\u003e you’ll have a line that appears close to 0 Mbit, relative to other\n\u003e flows, and we probably wouldn’t want to change the scaling for the\n\u003e scaled bandwidth plots to accommodate that...\n\nI think the important part of this is that it would be reflected in the\ntotal bandwidth score. I've been meaning to implement this for a while\nfor netperf UDP_RR, because otherwise you can get spurious bandwidth\ndrops as latency decreases just because the latency measurement flows\ntake up more bandwidth. But, well, irtt sort of made that less urgent ;)\n\nBut I could revisit; I do believe I already capture the data from irtt\n(I think?).\n\n-Toke\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064",
"url": "https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
},
{
"@type": "MessageCard",
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"hideOriginalBody": "false",
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB",
"title": "Re: [tohojo/flent] testing the behavior of small queue building non-ecn'd flows (#148)",
"sections": [
{
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "**Toke Høiland-Jørgensen**",
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png",
"activitySubtitle": "@tohojo",
"facts": [

]
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"name": "Add a comment",
"@type": "ActionCard",
"inputs": [
{
"isMultiLine": true,
"@type": "TextInput",
"id": "IssueComment",
"isRequired": false
}
],
"actions": [
{
"name": "Comment",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"tohojo/flent\",\n\"issueId\": 148,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueComment.value}}\"\n}"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Close issue",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \"tohojo/flent\",\n\"issueId\": 148\n}"
},
{
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064"
}
],
"@type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View on GitHub"
},
{
"name": "Unsubscribe",
"@type": "HttpPOST",
"target": "https://api.github.com",
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 369788858\n}"
}
],
"themeColor": "26292E"
}
]</script>