Pete Heist writes: >> On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:40 PM, flent-users wrote: >> >> Hi Pete, >> >> > On Aug 25, 2018, at 19:53, Pete Heist wrote: >> > >> > 50ms wouldn't be too disruptive in most cases. At 1 Mbit, the 5% of bandwidth threshold is crossed. >> >> Would it be possible to simply also show this bandwidth use in the >> bandwidth plots (say as a single data series accumulated over all >> irtt probes), then the user could select the interval and still be >> able to easily assess the effects on other bandwidth flows? I believe >> that would also be great for the netperf UDP/ICMP streams, but >> probably harder to implement > > > We could, but I would think what might happen is that in most cases > you’ll have a line that appears close to 0 Mbit, relative to other > flows, and we probably wouldn’t want to change the scaling for the > scaled bandwidth plots to accommodate that... I think the important part of this is that it would be reflected in the total bandwidth score. I've been meaning to implement this for a while for netperf UDP_RR, because otherwise you can get spurious bandwidth drops as latency decreases just because the latency measurement flows take up more bandwidth. But, well, irtt sort of made that less urgent ;) But I could revisit; I do believe I already capture the data from irtt (I think?). -Toke -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064