Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notifications@github.com> writes:
> flent-users <notifications@github.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:34 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <
>> notifications@github.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, finally got around to look at this. Wow, that's an annoying
> change for
>>> the Flent use case. Did you find a workaround?
>>>
>>
>> Other than ripping out the relevant commit or writing the netlnk
> code from
>> scratch? No. It's a pretty crippling change. Lemmee forward where
> the convo
>> stalled out.
>
> Right. I guess I'll go write a monitor mode for iproute2 and see if
> it'll be accepted upstream...
>
> But yeah, Steven's suggestion about just adding a flag was also my
> first
> thought...
It would be nice for this facility to work again. I have not been doing
any kernel-related work for a while, but will gladly test, as usual, if
you come up with something. I happen to prefer the idea of the generic
monitoring mode with high resolution timing support. Alternatively
updating the common "watch" utilities to have better than 1sec
resolution would be good.
>
> -Toke
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.