Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notifications@github.com> writes:

> flent-users <notifications@github.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:34 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <
>> notifications@github.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, finally got around to look at this. Wow, that's an annoying
> change for
>>> the Flent use case. Did you find a workaround?
>>>
>>
>> Other than ripping out the relevant commit or writing the netlnk
> code from
>> scratch? No. It's a pretty crippling change. Lemmee forward where
> the convo
>> stalled out.
>
> Right. I guess I'll go write a monitor mode for iproute2 and see if
> it'll be accepted upstream...
>
> But yeah, Steven's suggestion about just adding a flag was also my
> first
> thought...

It would be nice for this facility to work again. I have not been doing
any kernel-related work for a while, but will gladly test, as usual, if
you come up with something. I happen to prefer the idea of the generic
monitoring mode with high resolution timing support. Alternatively
updating the common "watch" utilities to have better than 1sec
resolution would be good.

>
> -Toke
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.