From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.toke.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.toke.dk by mail.toke.dk with LMTP id mH4eB0JhDVpHDwAAOr1fkg for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:58:26 +0100 Received: from web6.sd.eurovps.com (web6.sd.eurovps.com [77.235.54.103]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B9822E1EF for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:58:24 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=flent.org header.i=@flent.org header.b=MLhDmgs8; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b=CzlHSWF1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flent.org; s=default; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:Mime-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tOmGKbkVDfh9KtrGNkMcskRknTa9eVrK78TyRiAWtgE=; b=MLhDmgs8FJv0ZU68a7o3oRHiDL gRyZRv+/jH4FkrKf859aQtuLrvkLAIukr/iORSiubpzxNeZYimx1p7dFHS9E7WkdGsLriavXLMQnR j90hdc2yWSaF0cBujSvjpPvCrQTQH/kdsHO1Diy1ObkpML/7snAvhuyaUvi92Jt8D2emqLtmiSMD+ 1qrfRHF+P92u0n8FdId/1ggnaC453yHsGxMnOhDmqcwwbUjyrR25/iY84XFtS355Pn88NYmiRA+iC erYjkcq4Z17sWEbqdWeJGYKIVemgyCLPkAc0zXK83dRMIC2OpKHIRzIkTCG2U8d2OBE6N5zVKLE2j DhfVcSNQ==; Received: from [::1] (port=45273 helo=web6.sd.eurovps.com) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFGwA-0042hL-SC; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:58:22 +0200 Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com ([167.89.101.201]:44244) by web6.sd.eurovps.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFGw7-0042bV-TX for flent-users@flent.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:58:21 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=S++2N9o5HplJ1xsDLk4WGjTR9Oc=; b=CzlHSWF1p0wKE3PC kJvrOkO8hivWdn6IxN0VKrsVdew6q5vhFHnzw8bw1Y/c7dbVJK7Nqvqy5wcrwr3W XBiH0EYR9DcuXSKW4V77r+2scJYNo4iulQOUfSBdEdUfRJgxcwHIeQVZYJrPHaJa hkEyLFDjrhnxAkmviXmc4czYEtg= Received: by filter0453p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0453p1iad2-25834-5A0D6111-16 2017-11-16 09:57:37.83025252 +0000 UTC Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 3lg07kyTSW6_VDr62ZVPEQ for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:57:37.735 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:57:37 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= To: tohojo/flent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: tohojo X-GitHub-Recipient: flent-users X-GitHub-Reason: comment X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: flent-users@flent.org tracking: X-SG-EID: IRsowsd9yCOJafMG0EWGsh26xBq50lgDrxWUlCCqUntXDRkJevexy/s18Yj2sxn+6zzxFUgpJRMdYB EvxY8EUAhnhkxN7fHHPi4Y0b47ZrktCeXfniX5CkgINFpoAmV0WkV+xJ8zJHpxcb8UzkWHlT+cYN2L mmVozmqip8dm+vOYRqt9Cq0w/PKN4ukyPjZgzOQXPoxA2rlzYA6uSSIURva6HsX9YuYV/QSpV4sbNb d80J73GlY6pN/pln3HwWuy Subject: Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106) X-BeenThere: flent-users@flent.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 List-Id: Flent discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: tohojo/flent Cc: Comment , flent-users Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5879303818751399403==" Errors-To: flent-users-bounces@flent.org Sender: "Flent-users" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web6.sd.eurovps.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - toke.dk X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - flent.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web6.sd.eurovps.com: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: mailman/mailman X-Authenticated-Sender: web6.sd.eurovps.com: mailman@flent.org --===============5879303818751399403== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a0d611196e71_4c7e3fe3be522f38749c3"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----==_mimepart_5a0d611196e71_4c7e3fe3be522f38749c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Okay, basic Flent support for irtt implemented in 2503caba7d32f847b242eede225638bd64d88d53 - there's an rrul_be_irtt test that will substitute the netperf udp_rr test for irtt. However, I don't really want to duplicate all tests for irtt, so I think a better way to integrate it is needed. I.e., a test should specify that it just wants a UDP RTT measurement, and Flent will pick the right tool depending on availability. Something similar might be useful for TCP (someone wanted to substitute iperf for netperf in #115). Picking a tool depending on what is available locally is straight-forward, but checking for server-side support is trickier. Is it OK to punt on that, or should we fire off a one-shot test (something like `irtt client -d 1ms -wait 1ms `) to check? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/106#issuecomment-344873086 ----==_mimepart_5a0d611196e71_4c7e3fe3be522f38749c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay, basic Flent support for irtt implemented in 2503cab - there's an rrul_be_irtt test that w= ill substitute the netperf udp_rr test for irtt.

However, I don't really want to duplicate all tests for irtt, so I think= a better way to integrate it is needed. I.e., a test should specify that i= t just wants a UDP RTT measurement, and Flent will pick the right tool depe= nding on availability. Something similar might be useful for TCP (someone w= anted to substitute iperf for netperf in #115).

Picking a tool depending on what is available locally is straight-forwar= d, but checking for server-side support is trickier. Is it OK to punt on th= at, or should we fire off a one-shot test (something like irtt client= -d 1ms -wait 1ms <hostname>) to check?

&mda= sh;
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this e= mail directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.3D""

= ----==_mimepart_5a0d611196e71_4c7e3fe3be522f38749c3-- --===============5879303818751399403== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Flent-users mailing list Flent-users@flent.org http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org --===============5879303818751399403==--