From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1660047167; bh=vG1I03o0XlkcBtRA7AJ6dOZOmc33K1VC6qfksBKNjOs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ITUnjcjMQPL4A+utbUP5kft+yMq7wS8RDywV8KFGuuDeN50VOMXLt2J2eDzCZrbLx 2QHwBdItNt0XZPxi3YKFkA+P+K71Gt2j04XDaXZyoGZBizegRcJc+YLZnjxOGSB98/ l8IBo1o/T84oWghJggyMUGN0iNCFQsTVMMJH14UR9/ucW9s+p8P989482QTLj5FyCd WyY9f2EyBUPdWiaf5G8SFof+2X2KzxJ/YMSPr7ReOWt81zt4Mwwh/zY4t/FeSCJ3rd DD3v0FYQCglJ9/ZWpycxhI8GJuc+6MB7JoMpRlSOLllmRGVpY/yFqs9h9EwyH+OscT t5QOPbNoE2hKg== To: Erik Taraldsen In-Reply-To: References: <87a68f9cft.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:47 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87zggd8vk0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: JBJATNPPZIIRIDUDWHWZDMUIUKQT5VNR X-Message-ID-Hash: JBJATNPPZIIRIDUDWHWZDMUIUKQT5VNR X-MailFrom: toke@toke.dk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: flent-users@flent.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.5 Precedence: list Subject: [Flent-users] Re: Aggregate test results List-Id: Flent discussion list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Erik Taraldsen writes: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > >> >> You mean, when loading data sets A and B (in separate .flent.gz files), >> you want a graph of total throughput A+B? No, that's not currently >> supported, you can only plot data files separately... >> > > That is what I want to achieve, yes. The intention is to have multiple > clients running the same test at the same time. Verify if the total > capacity of the wifi router decreases under load or stays relatively the > same. So the way I usually do this is to drive all the client tests from a single Flent instance. There are two ways to do this: Run Flent on the server and connect to each client, running the test "in reverse", so to speak - the --swap-up-down parameter is meant specifically for this. The alternative is to use the remote execution features of Flent to start the test binaries on the clients using ssh (works best using a dedicated control network). This is what the --remote-host parameter is for. The benefit of driving everything in one test is that this way Flent also takes care of synchronising the data series into a single run (assuming clocks are reasonably synchronised across machines when using --remote-host), and you'll get everything in one data file. It can be a bit fiddly to set up, but you can encode everything into a single batch file so repetitions are easy... -Toke